Difference between revisions of "Reporting"

From radlines.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Started)
 
m (]])
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Authors
 
{{Authors
|author1=[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström
+
|author1=[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]]
 
|author2=
 
|author2=
 
}}
 
}}
 
If your report is likely to undergo double reading, it needs to be more detailed, particularly in the inclusion of conditions you have negated, because the doctor who will do the double reading then gets to know that you have looked at those locations.
 
If your report is likely to undergo double reading, it needs to be more detailed, particularly in the inclusion of conditions you have negated, because the doctor who will do the double reading then gets to know that you have looked at those locations.

Revision as of 10:27, 26 May 2018

Author: Mikael Häggström [notes 1]
If your report is likely to undergo double reading, it needs to be more detailed, particularly in the inclusion of conditions you have negated, because the doctor who will do the double reading then gets to know that you have looked at those locations.
Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "notes", but no corresponding <references group="notes"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing