Difference between revisions of "Template:Intrauterine devices - indications and choice of modality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Boortz, Hillary E.; Margolis, Daniel J. A.; Ragavendra, Nagesh; Patel, Maitraya K.; Kadell, Barbara M. (2012). "Migration of Intrauterine Devices: Radiologic Findings and Implications for Patient Care
". RadioGraphics 32 (2): 335–352. doi: . ISSN 0271-5333.
m (i) |
m (Mikael Häggström moved page Template:Intrauterine devices - choice of modality to Template:Intrauterine devices - indications and choice of modality: Broader) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:23, 2 July 2019
Choice of modality
- Transvaginal ultrasonography is generally the initial investigation of choice.[1]
- Projectional radiography ("X-ray") of intrauterine devices can detect the absence versus presence of an intrauterine device, which is useful when an IUD is not found on vaginal examination and ultrasonography.[1]
- CT is indicated in suspected complications such as perforation of nearby organs and/or abscess formation.[1]
- MRI is rarely indicated, but can visualize an IUD with both 1.5-T and 3.0-T magnets.[1]