Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reporting

575 bytes added, 12:41, 6 July 2018
+Comparison
}}
==General notes on reporting==
The information contained ===Double reading===If your report is likely to undergo double reading, it needs to be more detailed, particularly in the reporting sections assume that inclusion of conditions you have negated, because the clinician has requested doctor who will do the imaging for the topic of the article double reading then gets to know that you have looked at hand, but should be tailored to any particular questions or requests by the clinicianthose locations.
If your ===Comparison===A report should include the date(s) of any images used for comparison. Normal images are excepted from this, if the absence of pathology is likely clear without needing to undergo double readingcompare to previous images. For short reports, the date can be integrated in a sentence if the form layout allows, it needs such as ''"Compared to the CT July 3, 2018, the consolidation..."''. Where multiple comparisons are expected, the comparison should be more detailedmentioned separately at the beginning of the report, particularly such as ''"Comparison: July 3, 2018"''. ===Tailoring===The information contained in the inclusion reporting sections in Radlines assume that the clinician has requested the imaging for the topic of conditions you have negatedthe article at hand, because but should be tailored to any particular questions or requests by the doctor who will do the double reading then gets to know that you have looked at those locationsclinician.
Administrators, Editors, Administrators
3,484

edits

Navigation menu