Administrators, Editors, Administrators
3,484
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Depth: Lack of explanation
*'''Double-reading''': If your report is likely to undergo double reading, it needs to be more detailed, particularly in the inclusion of conditions you have negated, because the doctor who will do the double reading then gets to know that you have looked at those locations.
*Lack of '''previous reports''', whose minor findings can often be summarized similar to "otherwise no additional findings since previous exam on [date]".
*Lack of '''explanation''' from existing evidence. In contrast, in for example an [[X-ray of the foot]] in a patient with foot pain, the finding of a fracture generally makes is unnecessary to report on for example very small calcaneal spurs.
==Comparison==
