Difference between revisions of "Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis"

From radlines.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+Evaluation)
m (→‎Evaluation: not on Commons)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect:
 
On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect:
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
File:Sagital sinus thrombus.JPG|CT venogram showing a filling defect in the sagittal sinus (black arrow)
 
 
File:Duralvenoussinusthrombosis.png|A dural venous sinus thrombosis of the transverse sinus. Greater on the right than left.
 
File:Duralvenoussinusthrombosis.png|A dural venous sinus thrombosis of the transverse sinus. Greater on the right than left.
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>

Revision as of 11:54, 3 September 2018

Author: Mikael Häggström [notes 1]

Planning

Choice of investigation

In suspected cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), computed tomographic venography (CTV), magnetic resonance venography (MRV), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) have similar accuracies in the diagnosis.[1] Main advantages of MRI include rapid image taking and not being contraindicated in patients with for example a pacemaker. MRV, on the other hand, has a greater sensitivity in detecting parenchymal lesions.[1] A study from India has suggested CTV as an initial investigation of suspected CVST, with MRV being the next step in patients with equivocal findings on the CTV.[2]

Evaluation

On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mahesh R Patel. Brain Imaging in Venous Sinus Thrombosis. Updated: Feb 25, 2018
  2. Issar P, Chinna S, Issar SK (2017). "Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by CT, MRI and MR Venography. ". J Assoc Physicians India 65 (11): 16-21. PMID 29322704. Archived from the original. . 


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "notes", but no corresponding <references group="notes"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing