Difference between revisions of "Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis"

From radlines.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Evaluation: not on Commons)
(Linked)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Planning==
 
==Planning==
 
===Choice of investigation===
 
===Choice of investigation===
In suspected '''cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)''', computed tomographic venography (CTV), magnetic resonance venography (MRV), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) have similar accuracies in the diagnosis.<ref name=Medscape>{{cite web|url=https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/338750-overview|title=Brain Imaging in Venous Sinus Thrombosis|author=Mahesh R Patel}} Updated: Feb 25, 2018</ref> Main advantages of MRI include rapid image taking and not being contraindicated in patients with for example a pacemaker. MRV, on the other hand, has a greater sensitivity in detecting parenchymal lesions.<ref name=Medscape/> A study from India has suggested CTV as an initial investigation of suspected CVST, with MRV being the next step in patients with equivocal findings on the CTV.<ref name="pmid29322704">{{cite journal| author=Issar P, Chinna S, Issar SK| title=Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by CT, MRI and MR Venography. | journal=J Assoc Physicians India | year= 2017 | volume= 65 | issue= 11 | pages= 16-21 | pmid=29322704 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=29322704  }} </ref>
+
In suspected '''cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)''', [[head CT]] venography (CTV), [[head MRI]] venography (MRV), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) have similar accuracies in the diagnosis.<ref name=Medscape>{{cite web|url=https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/338750-overview|title=Brain Imaging in Venous Sinus Thrombosis|author=Mahesh R Patel}} Updated: Feb 25, 2018</ref> Main advantages of MRI include rapid image taking and not being contraindicated in patients with for example a pacemaker. MRV, on the other hand, has a greater sensitivity in detecting parenchymal lesions.<ref name=Medscape/> A study from India has suggested CTV as an initial investigation of suspected CVST, with MRV being the next step in patients with equivocal findings on the CTV.<ref name="pmid29322704">{{cite journal| author=Issar P, Chinna S, Issar SK| title=Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by CT, MRI and MR Venography. | journal=J Assoc Physicians India | year= 2017 | volume= 65 | issue= 11 | pages= 16-21 | pmid=29322704 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=29322704  }} </ref>
  
 
==Evaluation==
 
==Evaluation==

Revision as of 12:00, 3 September 2018

Author: Mikael Häggström [notes 1]

Planning

Choice of investigation

In suspected cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), head CT venography (CTV), head MRI venography (MRV), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) have similar accuracies in the diagnosis.[1] Main advantages of MRI include rapid image taking and not being contraindicated in patients with for example a pacemaker. MRV, on the other hand, has a greater sensitivity in detecting parenchymal lesions.[1] A study from India has suggested CTV as an initial investigation of suspected CVST, with MRV being the next step in patients with equivocal findings on the CTV.[2]

Evaluation

On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect:

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mahesh R Patel. Brain Imaging in Venous Sinus Thrombosis. Updated: Feb 25, 2018
  2. Issar P, Chinna S, Issar SK (2017). "Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by CT, MRI and MR Venography. ". J Assoc Physicians India 65 (11): 16-21. PMID 29322704. Archived from the original. . 


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "notes", but no corresponding <references group="notes"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing