Difference between revisions of "Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+Evaluation) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Top |
|author1=[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] | |author1=[[User:Mikael Häggström|Mikael Häggström]] | ||
|author2= | |author2= | ||
}} | }} | ||
==Planning== | ==Planning== | ||
| − | ===Choice of | + | ===Choice of modality=== |
| − | In suspected '''cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)''', | + | In suspected '''cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)''', [[head CT]] venography (CTV), [[head MRI]] venography (MRV), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) have similar accuracies in the diagnosis.<ref name=Medscape>{{cite web|url=https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/338750-overview|title=Brain Imaging in Venous Sinus Thrombosis|author=Mahesh R Patel}} Updated: Feb 25, 2018</ref> Main advantages of MRI include rapid image taking and not being contraindicated in patients with for example a pacemaker. MRV, on the other hand, has a greater sensitivity in detecting parenchymal lesions.<ref name=Medscape/> A study from India has suggested CTV as an initial investigation of suspected CVST, with MRV being the next step in patients with equivocal findings on the CTV.<ref name="pmid29322704">{{cite journal| author=Issar P, Chinna S, Issar SK| title=Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by CT, MRI and MR Venography. | journal=J Assoc Physicians India | year= 2017 | volume= 65 | issue= 11 | pages= 16-21 | pmid=29322704 | doi= | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=29322704 }} </ref> |
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== | ||
On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect: | On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
| − | |||
File:Duralvenoussinusthrombosis.png|A dural venous sinus thrombosis of the transverse sinus. Greater on the right than left. | File:Duralvenoussinusthrombosis.png|A dural venous sinus thrombosis of the transverse sinus. Greater on the right than left. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
| − | + | {{Bottom}} | |
| − | {{ | ||
Latest revision as of 18:47, 6 November 2018
Author:
Mikael Häggström [notes 1]
Contents
Planning
Choice of modality
In suspected cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), head CT venography (CTV), head MRI venography (MRV), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) have similar accuracies in the diagnosis.[1] Main advantages of MRI include rapid image taking and not being contraindicated in patients with for example a pacemaker. MRV, on the other hand, has a greater sensitivity in detecting parenchymal lesions.[1] A study from India has suggested CTV as an initial investigation of suspected CVST, with MRV being the next step in patients with equivocal findings on the CTV.[2]
Evaluation
On CTV, a CVST is seen as a contrast filling defect:
A dural venous sinus thrombosis of the transverse sinus. Greater on the right than left.
Notes
- ↑ For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Radlines:Authorship for details.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Mahesh R Patel. Brain Imaging in Venous Sinus Thrombosis. Updated: Feb 25, 2018
- ↑ Issar P, Chinna S, Issar SK (2017). "Evaluation of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis by CT, MRI and MR Venography. ". J Assoc Physicians India 65 (11): 16-21. PMID 29322704. Archived from the original. .
