CT urography

From radlines.org
Revision as of 10:10, 3 December 2018 by Mikael Häggström (talk | contribs) (→‎Configuration: Or younger)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Author: Mikael Häggström [notes 1]

Planning

Indication for CT urography in hematuria

Most patients with macroscopic hematuria, especially when over 50 years, should undergo both cystoscopy and CT urography.[1]

Microscopic hematuria indicates further workup with cystoscopy and/or CT urography if there are significant underlying risk factors, mainly:[1]

  • Male sex
  • Age, especially being older than 60 years
  • Smoking
  • Pelvic radiation

Configuration

In Swedish practice,[2] the protocol is determined by age:

  • In patients under 40 years, generally:
  1. Low-radiation-dose of urinary system, without IV contrast
  2. Normal-radiation-dose with split bolus IV contrast, 7.5 minutes and 90 seconds before image acquisition.
  • In patients over 40 years, or younger if suspicion of cancer is high:
  1. Low-radiation-dose of whole abdomen, without IV contrast
  2. Normal-radiation-dose of whole abdomen 20 seconds after bolus tracking, for visualization of renal cortex.
  3. Normal-radiation-dose of upper abdomen 40 seconds after the previous, for visualization of all renal parenchyma.
  4. Normal-radiation-dose of urinary system 7.5 minutes after IV contrast, for renal pelvises and ureters.

Regardless of age, 1 liter water is given orally 1 hours before the CT, as well as avoiding urination during 1 hour before, in order to increase renal filtration and distend the bladder.[1] If the images show insufficient contrast filling in the renal pelvices and ureters, an additional image is taken after 5 minutes, possibly with the patient lying on the stomach to make gravity help fill the ureters.

Evaluation

  • CT without contrast: Look for kidneys stones. If found, see CT of kidney stone disease.
  • CTs with contrast: Tumors within the kidney, ureters or bladder.
  • Signs of bladder tumor:
  • Bladder wall thickening, especially when nodular or irregular.[1] However, the anterior wall is frequently thickened in a normal underdistended bladder.[1] Also, diffuse bladder wall thickening rarely represents malignancy.[1] Look both at images 40 seconds after IV contrast and with contrast-containing bladder lumen, since that contrast may both demarcate a tumor as well as obscure one by beam-hardening artifacts.[1]
  • Lymph nodes. Enlarged lymph nodes may be metastases. Generalized lymphadenopathy may indicate lymphoma, and in such cases tumors in the urinary system may be lymphomas as well.[1]

Further evaluation of suspected tumors

Nodular bladder tumor.
  • Evaluate contrast enhancement by comparing images before and after IV contrast. Any focal hyperenhancement of the bladder wall must be considered suspicious for malignancy.[1] For transitional cell cancers, the most common form of bladder cancer, enhancement peaks at about 100 HU at approximately 60 seconds, and then decreasing slowly.[1] In lack of enhancement, consider a differential diagnosis of a hematoma, although the presence of an underlying tumor is still difficult to exclude.[1]
  • Measure size
  • For bladder tumors:
  • Classify shape such as for example nodular or polypoid. In case of well circumscribed and smoothly marginated borders, consider bladder leiomyoma as a differential diagnosis.[1]
  • Note any calcification of the bladder wall, indicates cystoscopy, particularly when there is bladder wall thickening.[1]
  • Signs of local spread or metastasis. The most commons sites of metastasis of bladder cancers are lymph nodes, bones, lungs, liver and peritoneum.[3]

Notes

  1. For a full list of contributors, see article history. Creators of images are attributed at the image description pages, seen by clicking on the images. See Radlines:Authorship for details.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 USA: Raman, Siva P.; Fishman, Elliot K. (2014). "Bladder Malignancies on CT: The Underrated Role of CT in Diagnosis ". American Journal of Roentgenology 203 (2): 347–354. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.12021. ISSN 0361-803X. 
  2. NU Hospital Group, Sweden, 2018
  3. Shinagare, Atul B.; Ramaiya, Nikhil H.; Jagannathan, Jyothi P.; Fennessy, Fiona M.; Taplin, Mary-Ellen; Van den Abbeele, Annick D. (2011). "Metastatic Pattern of Bladder Cancer: Correlation With the Characteristics of the Primary Tumor ". American Journal of Roentgenology 196 (1): 117–122. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5036. ISSN 0361-803X.